If Wisconsin flips this weekend following the deep investigations into massive voter fraud - the whole electoral process will go in Trump's favour as the Kraken is unleashed on Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, which will topple one after the other... Trump 2020/2024 Treason lawyers biting at the bit ready to be unleashed on MSM and marxist supporting states and governers... Book now for a grandstand seat...
The media are the new enemy of the people - but the sheepal and useful idiots don't realise this, until too late!
Our UK media are truly going down in flames, as I often say, with viewing figures for what was maybe only six years ago of tens of millions watching the BBC highlight programme Newsweek plummeting to just 750,000 a few weeks ago, as more and more see the bias and radical marxist favouring or leaning as time goes on. 1000 people per day are cancelling their legal binding fees to the marxist propaganda network, with more and more lawyers getting behind them to represent them in court if need be.
But they just keep doing it - pushing the lefty marxist lunacy and fake bat flu hysteria and now have begun re-doing the man-made global catastrophe bullshit, as if the people haven't cottoned on yet?!?
The funding for all this go woke go broke (because that is happening worldwide) madness must be coming from Soros and other globalists, like Gates as well probably, and the ones who have become billionaires like Tony Blair on the backs of our (the peoples) taxes.
I do see a day when the centre of media is afire...
I guess they gain popularity through fear mongering or sensationalism, which many peeps apparently ascribe to... So in particularly this past four years they have been grabbing at sensationalist notions probably from their twitter/twatter bubble world, and converting this into fake news while blending in with it their evil and greedy bias propaganda...
They more than likely also (I've seen thousands of sources but unless we follow up each and every of these with feet on the ground we can only speculate - which most of us with half a brain (counts out the moronic left) do quite well) receive HEAVY funding from globalists like Soros, the EU, Gates, and a number of Bergs... all hell bent on chaos...
Seem there is good news from Pennsylvanian, earlier than imagined, as regards from judicial acceptance of voter fraud, and the flip looks to be clearly in Trump's favour... Eight other states could topple in similar fashion, in Trump's favour, considering what seems to be coming from good sources just now...
Have a long conversation planned for tonight with my US source/s in upper echelons - all of which are giving me tantalising snippets the MSM (enemy of the people) won't wish or desire to put up as news...
The destruction of the MSM is planned...
Big Orgs and Corps will follow - but the bar stewards can get funding from their masters the globalists, who also should be facing laws tantamount to treason sometime next year...
I just had my election fraud topic closed unceremoniously. That's the 3rd topic I've had closed on here. Apparently I push buttons and people get ruffled. Someone has access to the "close thread" button that shouldn't (in my humble opinion). I'm practicing being humble.
There are these actual conspiracies happening in the real world. Control of information is an actual conspiracy. I think it's natural people want control of the narrative. But when the media become complicit, democracy is doomed. It will suffocate from lack of oxygen.
DA was pinged more than six months ago! I recall seeing this in an in-tray... Someone uttered: "Don't you mince about on that place?"
Well I couldn't lie...
Apparently there are four in-depth spooks floating around here (I don't know who they are) and noted dodgy activity from way back at years' beginning, after the '''changes''' and they are specialised in the world of '''donations''' links and forum activity...
But all I am is a bee in the lefty ears... ...all I get are scraps...
YES the clear lefty bias activity was noted way, way back...
Tick-Tock Tick-Tock as we say.........
The specialist treason lawyers are cuing up with foam dripping from their mouths currently - it is so exciting.
The annoying thing is every time I mention the old way of dealing with treason I get strange looks...
This kind of selective censorship is the worst part of the past few years. I've created a number of threads on censorship and it's danger to the people. I hate to see people make mistakes but this one will come back and bite them in are arse one day.
Baby was a black sheep. Baby was a whore. Baby got big and baby get bigger. Baby get something. Baby get more. Baby, baby, baby was a rock-and-roll nigger. Oh, look around you, all around you, riding on a copper wave. Do you like the world around you? Are you ready to behave?
Outside of society, they're waitin' for me. Outside of society, that's where I want to be.
Baby was a black sheep. Baby was a whore. You know she got big. Well, she's gonna get bigger. Baby got a hand; got a finger on the trigger. Baby, baby, baby is a rock-and-roll nigger.
Outside of society, that's where I want to be. Outside of society, they're waitin' for me.
I was lost in a valley of pleasure. I was lost in the infinite sea. I was lost, and measure for measure, love spewed from the heart of me. I was lost, and the cost, and the cost didn't matter to me. I was lost, and the cost was to be outside society.
Jimi Hendrix was a nigger. Jesus Christ and Grandma, too. Jackson Pollock was a nigger. Nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger.
Outside of society, they're waitin' for me. Outside of society, if you're looking, that's where you'll find me. Outside of society, they're waitin' for me. Outside of society.
I did like punks when I was one but no. I just like that you're singing to Moot, before someone bans him. It's good he has someone to share their misery with him. It might give him some solace in his isolation and self hate.
Reset....LMFAO.... The ideologies of mankind... That is like asking if there is life on other planets and are they watching us? Of course there is and of course they are... Face it, look from the outside in, gaze upon a planet where the so called intelligent life form will kill anything including each other, where some have everything and others have nothing, and those that have everything possess an insatiable quest for more because there is never enough... Only on this planet can one witness starvation when 20% of our food supply is wasted and thrown in the garbage on a daily basis... Only on this planet the poor huddle in masses and there is change lying on the ground in every mall parking lot... Only on this planet people claim to be your friend to your face and as soon as your back is turned your identity is trashed in the next conversation... Only on this planet they expend upon resources in which the sole purpose is the ultimate destruction of the world...
So the question I pose to the inhabitants is of course we are being watched, for one day we will have the capability to venture beyond our tiny little envelope in space, and when we do our so called norms and values will accompany us, and we are a danger to any evolved species...
You ponder which ideology will prevail and become the future of mankind, I ponder if mankind is worthy of existence, we were once an incredible species with empathy and compassion, now we have become a liability for which the universe will decide our fate, for the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one...
I presume from all this you support The Great Reset. But perhaps the better reset would be to remove the humans. Now I actually agree that the population explosion is the direct cause of the environment problems. But the only serious form of economics that has proven to work is capitalism. And rebuilding it assumes it doesn't work. That an oligarchy is somehow better. Or Socialism. None of this is evident to me.
Nation states serve only to keep us divided. I look forward to the day when mankind unites under the single banner of humanity, the only banner which should matter nowadays. If this leads to us laying down our hatreds and fears of each other in favor of global unity, I'm all for it.
Humans can manage nation states even in the presence of rival powers, why would humans then fail in the absence of enemies?
We have the societies that we have today because long ago a bunch of scattered tribes and villages organized themselves into the earliest human civilizations which then stood for thousands of years. Had they simply remained nomads and strove for nothing, we would never have achieved the level of progress that we had. Civilization as we know it would never have existed if people were incapable of uniting for the common good. Why can't advanced nations do the same in the modern day? The world is a much smaller place with today's transportation technology, you can get to China in a handful of hours! We are all practically neighbors with one another at this point, just as the old tribes were.
Furthermore, we are reaching the limits of what we can accomplish as a divided species. We are, even still, just a bunch of tribes and villages squabbling with one another over petty scraps. Why can we not unite as even our most primitive of ancestors had before us? Once we do so, we can achieve even greater heights, just as they did. With our combined resources, undistracted by the threat of infighting, we could reach for the stars themselves!
It might surprise you to find a lot of people across the globe hate you. Or they want to rob you. Or they don't care if you live or die. This is the human condition. This is why borders exist. If the Indian's could have defeated the European's, they would have eaten your ancestors since most of them were cannibals. They still want your land. They always will. Blacks want their reparations. White people want to keep their property. China wants you as their slave. So does most of the Middle East.
Here's the deal. You are assuming there is something better. You have no proof there is something better. Or we'd probably already have it.
Of course some people outside of our borders hate us, but the same could be said for people within our own borders and we don't dissolve our countries just because it contains some dangerous people. Even some of the colonies of America had warred with one another before becoming a single nation, these are just growing pains.
Furthermore, saying that there can't be something better or we'd already have it is just silly. Imagine if we said that throughout all of history. "We can't find an alternative to walking, otherwise we'd already have it. We can't find an alternative to horseback riding, or we'd already have it. Surely nothing could go faster than an automobile, or we'd already have it. Planes? Rockets? Pfft." The reality is that we are *always* finding something better, all the time. This is what humans do, this is perhaps all we do.
I can't tell if you are agreeing with me or not now. Humans have always been in conflict. You are either defending yourself or you are dying. Only in the bible do the meek inherit the earth. For humans, the strong eat the weak. Same with the fish in the sea btw.
I don't have a problem with your optimistic regarding utopia. But these aren't practical ideas. Once those borders come down, the country will rapidly devolve. It will not be "great again". It will be like the people who move in.
I'm not asking for "utopia." Borders mean less today than they ever have in the past. People are constantly moving in and moving out, and anyone can visit anywhere for just about any reason. If someone wanted to do harm, they'd just do it, and the number of people we see doing harm is within a manageable threshold. Having hundreds of governments working against each other is just holding ourselves back by wasting everyone's time and resources fighting one another in small and petty ways that add up over time. To do away with them and establish something more cohesive is just practical, and until we do so we're always going to be at risk of another large-scale conflict. It will be rough at first, but everything is rough at first. As I said before, there will be growing pains, and the long term benefits will be worth it.
I'm reminded of some illegal Nigerian's in my city stealing identities from a local bank and draining accounts and moving the money overseas.
Or Mexican cartel members kidnapping and torturing local residents and bribing their families. Or selling dangerous street modified drugs that kill thousands. Or prostituting children by the thousands. I guess not all of them want to do yard maintenance.
One of my favs is Islamics stabbing people to death on the subway. And of course Islamics literally burning down all the Christian churches in France.
Yeah, color me the optimist. But let's not see what the stampede brings.
Let me tell you that there are humans that work like that. I work like that and many of my friends work like that. And we all look forward to the day when we all see ourselves as humans sharing a planet.
I think a global human civilization is inevitable. People unite over time, limited only by the tools and technology available to facilitate their interaction. Put ten thousand unaffiliated people together on a Japan-sized island and it will be messy at first, but check back in a thousand years and they'll have a stable civilization. The same principles apply today. We are just eight-billion people stuck in the same room together, waiting for time to mend our differences.
I strongly disagree. In this world there are not only wildly different cultures, factions, ways of doing things and identities, there are people who hate and wish harm often for no good reason what so ever. A global human civilisation would be paralysed by culture clash, ideological disagreements, crime and be vulnerable to being taken over be a tyrant that likely would focus almost the entirety of taxes on lining his/her pockets and terrorising anyone they chose.
Fact is, there's no way to avoid it. We can't stop people from interacting forever, and cultural understandings are formed through said interaction. Transportation technology is always getting better and cheaper. You can already go to Shanghai in a handful of hours, and soon it will be highly affordable to do so. What's to stop people from visiting out of curiosity, talking to the locals, wandering the streets, maybe moving in? What's to stop them from doing the same? We're in a giant melting pot, and we are already mixing. Besides, it wouldn't happen all at once. It would start gradually with international laws to get us all on the same page, step by step until we're more or less operating the same way, at least in the ways that matter. Assuming that this system would require an autocrat seems a little presumptuous as well. Since when has federation ever required dictatorship?
History has nasty pattern that counteracts the very idea of a global human civilisation, when there are weak boarders/disrespect for national identity/disrespect for national cultures/ etc nasty people take advantage of that and normal people start to fall back on nationalism, keep in mind that nationalism varies from being proud of and protective of one nation like Trump is(and the traditions, culture and ways of life associated with said nation) to the sorts of warmongering,bigoted totalitarianism that gives nationalism a bad name. Once that happens communication/trade between countries slows down, immigration is stigmatised in many circles and wars tend to breakout, this has happened multiple times on a smaller scale in the last few centuries alone and right now its happening on a global scale. A one world government would have to contend with all of these issues and the fact that every power hungry villain would fight tooth and nail to get to the top...
The root flaw that I see here is the conspiracy theory that Covid-19 was inflicted on the world. Pandemics are not new. This is just another one, and it has revealed weaknesses in the current world order.
What I find interesting is the fear of change expressed by the video. I have been through enough collapses inflicted by rampant capitalism, seen enough competent people loose their jobs and their health insurance through no fault of their own, to know that change is necessary. Our current system is a meat grinder.
Dealing ethically with technological change, like pandemics, is also nothing new. It is always a challenge, but trying to stop it is a waste of time. Rather, by observing the values of the Enlightenment - life, liberty, property - we can guide how technology changes the world.
The root of this fearful response to change, the paranoia expressed in these links, is the failure of governments to mitigate the ugly dimensions of globalism, where, for example, a real estate bubble in the US came close to crashing the world's economy in 2008. The idea that MORE unregulated capitalism will present this sort of disaster is exactly wrong.
I don't know of any "collapses inflated by rampant capitalism". Perhaps you could share those.
The Great Reset isn't a conspiracy theory. And yes they fully intend to leverage the chaos created by the virus to implement their "new world order". Nothing like some cockamamy new idea that is supposed to be better than capitalism which is based on natural laws of world order.
You weren't paying attention in 2008? You might consider watching "The Big Short" for a balanced look at the joys of unregulated capitalism. It has historical roots that go back as far as 1819, the first cyclical downturn in US history where people lost their jobs through no fault of their own.
Those laws are on the books. The FTC manages that. The FDA manages that for medical advertising. The SEC manages corruption on Wall Street. All these failsafes are already in place. We don't want to burn down the system. We want to ensure it's working and that's all.
Okay. You win. We have regulation (which I agreed with) and it's not necessarily a problem in most cases. But regulation is not socialism. Regulation merely tries to keep people honest. Socialism tries to enforce equity. This is radically different to me. If someone earns more, you don't assume it's because of fraud. Those are the exceptions.
That is what happens when people remove much needed regulations which tends to happen after people impose to much regulation, once harmful regulations are mixed in with and called necessary regulations both are at risk of being cut.