| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
as the feature already exists. 
I was able to get two of the images to where they were supposed to be, but this is taking all night. Most of the time, as in over 95% of it, when I drag an image to where it ought to be, it doesn't drop in place, it rolls to the top of the screen and ends up on my favorites page. I then have to delete it from there, and start the process all over, again.
There is a simple solution to this problem, and it's been around for years - have a simple drop down menu, from which a group's administrator can choose the gallery to which a deviation is to be sent. Yes, this is antique technology, and no, it doesn't look slick or glossy, but after over a half of a hour of bashing my head into the wall, trying to get DA's system to work, and finding that I have only two successful image relocations to show for my troubles, I find that I really don't give a d**n about slickness or glossiness. What I would like to see is a little functionality, and I don't believe that's too much to ask for.
There are four perfectly good images that I now have to throw out of my group, just because the developers seemed to be more interested in showing off than they were in creating a user-friendly system. At the current rate of success, those four remaining images would take over two hours to move, as opposed to the roughly 12 seconds a user of an "unsexy" menu driven system would need to produce the same results.
This needs to change. You can't ask users to accept that functionality will decline with time.