Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

 

Possible solution for the cached Literature problem

[x]  
Shop deviantART for the holidays Click here! :holly:
:iconordie:
Anyone who's even vaguely acquainted with the literature community these days knows that by far and large the single issue most lacking, and with grave results, is the possibility to prevent search engines such as Google to take a glimpse at a particular piece of writing, and from them on keeping a copy indefinitely through their so-called /caches/. This is a problem. Many editors accept only original work, and if a piece turns out on Google chances are they won't be willing to have lost first publication rights, and reject it outright. Writers, on the other hand, quite naturally are not fond to give away their work forever upon posting it on dA.

This had been a problem which has seemed to be hard to solve for technological issues, but in a recent conversation with `AbCat and a few others it was brought to attention that deviations tagged as Mature do not show up on cache. This is because they need an age-approved verification, obviously associated with an account, before they can be viewed. In what concerns search-engines, only the title is kept. What arose from that conversation was the question of whether deviantART could employ a parallel system, reliant on deviations being hidden from the eyes of guests, to resolve the problem of cached literature.

Thank you for reading.

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconbewareofthesnowman:
i endorse this suggestion

--
And yet those voices:
If you were not afraid, you would kill him!
:iconhell-on-a-stick:
well, hell. first a class action suit against yahoo groups now google. i suppose it could really screw 'first publication rights'.

--
Behold! I am that which must always overcome itself. - Friedrich Nietzche
Now you can buy my book here!--------->>> [link]
:iconjeysie:
I approve of this idea. Might help attract pro writers to go with all the pro artists that post here.

--
Have you hugged your resident Geek lately?

Co-Founder of #Aerialbot-Fans

Adopted Characters
Rewind - ~Transformer-Crew
Skids - ~DeviantART-G1-Crew
Heatwave - ~deviantart-SG-crew
Fall-From-Grace - ~DA-Gamers-Crew
:iconignisferroquefanclub:
I´d say if someone has a serious interest in publishing something then it shouldnt be posted on the internet in the first place ;)

But i still support the idea... although you could already use the mature content tag on a literature submission i think?

--
[link]
:iconordie:
Your opinion fails to take in account that deviantART intends to be a website for artists to improve (thus the late heavy focus through the medium of institutionalized critiques) rather than a mere expository of material. If deviantART wants to be used by writers of publishing caliber, then it must cater to them by allowing itself to permit workshops, critiquing, etc.

The Mature tag is but a patch, which locks a very large percentage of good writers who just happen to be under the age of 18. And to be honest most writers do not even know of this backdoor.
:iconordie:
I endorse Welsh nationalism.
:iconordie:
Indeed. People should have nothing to fear.
:iconpopsicleparticles:
haha, you said backdoor :eyes:

--
<Spiff-Johnson> I want a meatloaf sandwich.
<Jon-Law> zack, me too
<Jon-Law> except, like, a sandwich of meatloaf the dude, so I could gain his powers
:iconchiiildd:
I support this idea...
I also support getting the prints team to make up "I Support <insert thing>" bumper stickers...

I support supporting support.

--
unplug thephone.stop all the taps.itall comes flooding back.from poisoned cloud to poisoned dwarf>>what a nastydulkbhs SurprisE.the wormsll come for you big boots

Site Map