[x]

deviantART

 
Sign up to post to the forums! <3

I killed a guy....

Categories Forums > deviantART > Deviants
[x]  
Join Now | Buy deviantWEAR | Advertise Here
~DUzT:iconDUzT: May 7, 2004, 5:15:46 AM
never mind the subject!

Ok, picture this. It's about person A and person B:

"A" has a gun. He has it for safety, and has never used it. It is filled with three bullets.
"B" asks if he can borrow the gun. "A" says yes.
"B" kills a guy with it, and is convicted for murder. He gets the death penalty.

How should "A" be punished?

--
Life is a bitch and the bitch hates me

See this funny thing: [link]

And the really interesting forum topic: [link]

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0

~Stephen1212:iconStephen1212: May 7, 2004, 5:18:34 AM
Well the guilt would be enough but if he knew what B was going to then he should be done for collabrating (whoever you spell it)
~DUzT:iconDUzT: May 7, 2004, 5:23:36 AM
no, he didn't know it. so, why should he be guilty, when he only had it for protection, and WHY THE HELL did he lend it away...:hmm:

--
Life is a bitch and the bitch hates me

See this funny thing: [link]

And the really interesting forum topic: [link]
~davidrussell:icondavidrussell: May 7, 2004, 5:29:29 AM
sup guys

why would somebody borrow a gun if not to shoot somebody/something with it.

--
I'm a signature, get me out of here.

Elitist Forum Whores - We're better than you :|
~Stephen1212:iconStephen1212: May 7, 2004, 5:31:43 AM
Well tehn the guilt of not asking what he wanted it for, and for being stupid enough to lend it to someone and even stupiditer for getting one in the first place.
~dragon-chan88:icondragon-chan88: May 7, 2004, 5:33:08 AM
Well, I think that depends if A knew what B was going to do with the gun. For example, if B told A that B was going to uh...get the gun repaired for A and A consented, then I don't think that A should be held responsible for the death since A knew nothing of what B was going to do. Otherwise, if it is evident that A knew that B was going to murder someone when B asked for the gun, A should take some blame as well, unless B used force to take the gun from A.....did that make any sense? @_@

--
Fan girl of the Purple Teddy Bears!
!megabytemonster:iconmegabytemonster: May 7, 2004, 5:34:47 AM
If nobody have guns, you wouldn't need a gun for safety. It's kind of a vicious circle. In the UK no-one owns guns (except a minority such as farmers, people who do it for sport etc.), so you don't need a gun to protect yourself.

A shouldn't be punished though, unless he had some idea of what B's intentions were (why would someone just ask to borrow a gun? You would question them surely). It was B who commited the act.
!thomas-harris-jr:iconthomas-harris-jr: May 7, 2004, 5:41:20 AM
"A" should buy just one more bullet and put it through his skull for owning a gun in the first place. How stupid can you get.

--
No time for the ol' in-out love, I've just come to check the meter.
~matterless:iconmatterless: May 7, 2004, 5:42:12 AM
If it wasn't a gun it would just be some other weapon.
=kivienkathairon:iconkivienkathairon: May 7, 2004, 5:44:15 AM
So every person that has a gun is stupid?

--
:pointandlaugh: " It's not Art Theft. SheezyART says it's not"
~hereticschizoid:iconhereticschizoid: May 7, 2004, 5:45:35 AM
If every person who owns one gun is stupid then I'm a f-ing retard =D
Previous Page    12345...    Next Page
Sign up to reply to this thread! <3

Site Map

©2009 deviantART. All rights reserved
About Us | Contact Us | Help & FAQ Advertise | Services Etiquette | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Copyright Policy