I AM A GLBAL WARMING DENIER - LET'S TALK


jochannon's avatar
Climate changes - that's a fact. But let us suppose for a moment that the planet is warming up, let us suppose for a moment that this is due to Human activity.

1: How is this a problem?

2: What solution can you offer?
Comments154
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
525600-Midgets's avatar
I recommend fucking yourself in the ass.
DefineDeviancyDown's avatar
Consider:

Climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology Judith Curry has announced her resignation effective immediately on her blog, Climate, Etc. Curry is an honest researcher and a fair-minded disputant in the ongoing debates over man-made climate change. She excelled at pointing out the uncertainties and deficiencies of climate modeling. Given the thoroughly politicized nature of climate science her efforts to clarify what is known and unknown by climate science caused her to be pilloried as "anti-science" by other researchers who are convinced that man-made global warming is leading toward catastrophe.

climatechangedispatch.com/dise…

Hopefully this is just the beginning of defections from the junk science of global warming!!!
Theocrat7's avatar
Although I do not believe we are being told the truth about anthropomorphic global warming (the whole solar system actually goes through approximately 11 and 22 year cycles of warming and cooling). Also, search on Climategate and read the documented evidence that we have been being lied to. If you can remember back this long, in the 70's our self-proclaimed scientific dictators were warning us to fear global cooling.

But for sake of argument, lets say the globe is on a warming trend caused by human activity and here are my answers:

1. I might spend more time suntanning naked and getting skin cancer.
2. Suspend all taxes across the globe then everyone could afford energy efficient solutions. End all government activity because they are by far the worst offenders.
HinemiNeko's avatar
>the whole solar system actually goes through approximately 11 and 22 year cycles of warming and cooling
That is not consistent with actual solar output(which is not on the increase)
www.skepticalscience.com/globa…
www.skepticalscience.com/solar…

>in the 70's our self-proclaimed scientific dictators were warning us to fear global cooling.
That was a fringe theory overblown by the media:
www.skepticalscience.com/ice-a…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_c…
Concern peaked in the early 1970s, though "the possibility of anthropogenic warming dominated the peer-reviewed literature even then" [1] (a cooling period began in 1945, and two decades of a cooling trend suggested a trough had been reached after several decades of warming). This peaking concern is partially attributable to the fact much less was then known about world climate and causes of ice ages.
jochannon's avatar
:D Thank you for commenting!
PoeticAlpha's avatar
1: Co2 is going to continue to cause an imbalance in the chemical makeup of the earth's atmosphere faster than humans can naturally evolve. Carbon dioxide traps and holds heat and you don't want to disturb the temperature balance of all the biomes the earth has to offer. Immediately, we have to worry about rising sea levels due to melting polar icecaps. Mankind should be concerned with making sure we preserve as much land as possible in a world that's quickly reaching its carrying capacity. As we advance towards the estimated human population cap of about 10billion (speculated to be reached by the year 2050), the Earth's atmosphere and resources are going to become increasingly more important to sustain.

2: Reduce Co2 emission by advancing studies in the fields of solar and wind harvesting. You can also begin researching Co2 recycling. You could plant more flora to do the recycling for you. We could all move to another planet and dry that resource pool out. Theoretically, we could even take a day out of the week to not drive anywhere and we'd at least slow the effects of global warming. 
sonicgirl018's avatar
Do what you can to make the world just a little less polluted. like recycle or something.
jochannon's avatar
And that is a brilliant truth.
pixiefairydustpinup's avatar
1: If human activity is changing our climate and these changes aren't planned or predictable, then the future is very uncertain. If we don't know what these changes are or how they will affect us, then our response will likely be inadequate.  

2: Obviously we'd have to determine what activity is causing the planet to warm up or the climate to change. Then find an alternative way of doing it without harming the planet. 
sleepingbagboy's avatar
to be honest the sooner humans wipe themselves off the face of the planet the better the quicker the earth will heal
jochannon's avatar
Okay. Thanks for commenting.
Doc-Skitz's avatar
Climate change, like Darwinism, is junk science!
PoeticAlpha's avatar
What's Co2 ppm anyways?!
Doc-Skitz's avatar
400 PPM in the Antarctic, surpassing the readings junk scientists took four million years ago! Once again they can't predict with any certainty what next week's weather will be, but they know with absolute assurance the weather a hundred years hence.
PoeticAlpha's avatar
The first accurate scientific data supporting the fact that Co2 traps heat was performed in the 1960s. Since, Co2 and temperature correlations have stood strong and the levels also don't ever go down. It's been a constant and steady rising rate since we first started keeping track.

But who knows?! The thermometers could be rigged!!!
Doc-Skitz's avatar
Depends who does the analysis. Results can always be skewed. For instance, placing thermometers at airports creating proximal causality from all that jet exhaust, burning kilotons of kerosene. Then you got the artificially heated Urban Heat Island effect! And on and on...................... deck stacking for the desired result.
PoeticAlpha's avatar
It's a bit hard to believe that everyone does their analysis of Co2 levels at local airports but I could be mistaken. I'm hopping out of this clickbait thread THE FACE OF PURE DISGUST 
Doc-Skitz's avatar
Not everyone, just those who would propagandize global warming, God knows, there are enough of those charlatans.
jochannon's avatar
Okay. Thank you for commenting.
Doc-Skitz's avatar
Thank you for the opportunity!
gajus-tempus's avatar
once again - a simple comic strip will answer quite a LOT of questions (simplicity is the key to make complex stuff understandable - even to those with limited brain capacity):

xkcd.com/1732/
jochannon's avatar
Thank you for commenting.
SoaringWings38's avatar
1. Low places such as the Netherlands and Florida could be over taken by rising sea levels. For those places even a half meter could cover a large portion of the region.

2. Build more dikes and pumps to keep low places dry.