Terror attack at Seattle high school
CNN reports that the shooting began in the cafeteria, and that “at least one person has been airlifted.”
This is the 87th school shooting since the December 2012 shooting at Newtown Conneticut. (LINK)
Does it make a difference if the shooter is not a convert to Islam?
Can these high school shootings be considered terror attacks?
(edit for spelling and adding link)
"This was a terrorist act," Bratton said Friday. NYPD officer injured by ax-wielding man. Was attacker an Islamic extremist? Thompson converted to Islam two years ago and then at some point self-radicalized"...
I've noticed the term "radicalized" as in "he became 'radicalized'" as in WTF does that mean? The media parrots the police spokesmen or creates its own terms and then repeats them. So in those terms, an attack on a first grade classroom in Connecticut that leaves twenty little children massacred by gunshots is not considered terrorism however an axe-wielding idiot who injures two cops is an act of terror, because Islam is somehow related. Any number of school shootings, which are fast becoming a common occurrence in the US, do not get called terrorism since they are [not yet] related to "radicalized" islam. In other words, 'terror' is something we're being taught to associate only with Islam. My own views on Islam notwithstanding- since it's obvious there is a clear link to converting to that religion and then carrying out an act of violence- but it becomes something far more sinister when school massacres or even the murders of police in the rural northeast by some 'lone wolf survivalist' are spoken of as normal crimes because the Quran is not involved. Why does everyone go along with this?
To eliminate a problem, you gotta strike it in the heart. I don't agree with mental background checks at all, nor competency checks, but I do agree that the mental health of our youth is rancid and needs a lot of work. Thank you.
Like with many shootings, there wasn't anything any poorly paid public institutions could possibly spot in time to prevent this latest massacre. A normal teenager having a inability to control their emotions is just that- absolutely normal. Give them access to a gun and they can do things like this- which- if time could be turned back he would probably not have done with a second chance. My teenage years were miserable to, but my parents didn't worship guns and didn't have any in the house. If they had, all it would have taken was five minutes of a lapse of reasoning in my head (which I probably experienced a number of times) and I wouldn't be here.
Basic human psychology shows us that spoiling children is unhealthy. Those children who are most maladjusted and temperamental are those children who have never been told no. Having never experienced the harshness of real disappointment early on, they are unable to cope when they meet it later in life. In something of an irony, the "self-esteem movement" has given us more suicides, more school shootings, and more medicated students. In the same way the "war on poverty" increased it, and std's exploded after the introduction of sex ed. It's like these people have a fetish for creating bigger problems under the pretense of a solution.
Sadly, the answer from the ignorant cultural power brokers will be to coddle children more in response to this behavior, not less. These people are simply incapable of dealing with paradox. True love sometimes means tough love. To a "progressive", the only real love is soft, patronizing, unrealistic love which leaves one unprepared for cold reality.
Yes. I agree with all of that. My issue is how the problem is seemingly ignored and/or dismissed, and definitely not addressed, compared to other problems like Ebola plagues and terrorist attacks on home turf.
It's not a terrorist attack...
No, I agree ...it's not. It's worse than terror attacks because it happens more often and targets more vulnerable people (school kids).
And that somehow warrants less hysteria than recent terror-related incidents when it has happened, on average, every 8 days in the last 2 years?
It's such a normal occurrence that nobody cares anymore and it's part of normal daily life.
That's the scary bit. If there had been terror attacks that caused as many deaths, or diseases arriving that caused as many deaths, the government would pull out all the stops to make sure the deaths were brought under control and spend whatever was needed. Look at the anti-terror budget for the past 13 years. Imagine if as much money could have been spent to make schoolkids safe.
Which is more important...
In 14 months, 28 school gun deaths
In 14 months, 7 terror related deaths
In 14 months, 0 Ebola related deaths
Which is receiving the most funding to address the problem? Which is receiving the most media attention?