Neutron bombs aren't much more powerful than conventional explosives; their biggest threat is the radiation, which would be worthless for demolition and stupid for covering their tracks.
Anyway, why the fuck would the government use miniature nuclear weapons to demolish these buildings rather than conventional charges like any demolitions team? In fact, why bother with the demolitions at all, why not just hire a bunch of radical Islamists to hijack some airliners and fly them into American landmarks?
The more important part is that a neutron bomb releases 50% of its energy as radiation. No, this isn't some kind of long-lasting cancer that you could whine about. Anybody within a little over a kilometer of the blast zone would be dead in a few weeks of radiation poisoning. People within a kilometer would be immediately paralyzed and dead within two days. Unless the entire population and workforce of downtown New York dropped dead by the end of that September, unless those first response Firefighters and witnesses on the ground were immediately paralyzed by a radiation pulse, the theory that it was a Neutron bomb is undeniably, patently false and is probably the most easily disproven bullshit thing you've spouted in this entire thread.
bali was a fission mini nuke. large number of bodies were obliterated. large number of survivors recieved 50% burns, consistent with radiation burn, then died within 30 days, consistent with radiation sickness.
as per 911, the two nukes underground would prevent most radiation escaping. don't think your claims about distance and paralysed, no source given, however, there is a FOI video showing someone who was in the adjacent WTC when the "second plane" supposedly hit (what hit it is described as a nuke ball by some) and this killed him. will dig up link if you are interested.
1) because the ADL runs those antisemitic websites
2) because it is informative
3) because they don't have digital forensics/they don't wish to investigate the ADL/they haven't got round to it.
In reference to the media, the ADL was raided by the FBI because it was spying on US citizens and getting info for blackmail. Did the MSM accurately report this incident? no it was a lone gunman - er, lone researcher:
It isn’t a very well kept secret that the ADL and AIPAC are agencies of Israeli intelligence. Their litany of transgressions is being dragged into the open by former AIPAC Lobbyist Steve Rosen in his defamation lawsuit against that organization. In 2004, the FBI tried to close AIPAC down for spying, only to see their criminal cases blocked by Bush administration officials.
The lawsuit came after raids were made by the San Francisco Police Department and the FBI on offices of the ADL in both San Francisco and Los Angeles, which found that the ADL was engaged in extensive domestic spying operations on a vast number of individuals and institutions around the country.
During the course of the inquiry in San Francisco, the SFPD and FBI determined the ADL had computerized files on nearly 10,000 people across the country, and that more than 75 percent of the information had been illegally obtained from police, FBI files and state drivers’ license data banks.
from zionist MSM:
The ADL denied that it is associated with agencies of foreign governments particularly the Mossad, Israel's intelligence service. The ADL has acknowledged that it pays investigator around the country to report on organizations it suspects of hate crimes, anti-Jewish or anti-Israel activities, but says it does not condone illegal methods of obtaining information.
The group has launched a review of its procedures.
"We want to be sure ... there is adherence to our principles and our admonitions -- that we will only function within the law and we will not condone any violation of the law," said Melvin Salzburg, national chairman of the ADL.
Last week officials at the ADL sought to distance the organization from Bullock, now a 58-year-old dealer in Asian art and a zealous information gatherer who kept a database of 1,000 names and 500 organizations on his computer under the names "Arab," "Pinko," "Right," "Skins" and "ANC" (African National Congress).
"We knew nothing about the vast extent of the files," said Barbara Wahl, an attorney for the ADL. "Those are not ADL's files. Those are not ADL's terms ... ADL keeps no computerized network of information. That is all Cal's doing," she said, using the ADL's code name for Bullock.
I love how you keep on insinuating, that American Law Enforcement, both acknowledge your problem, do something drastic about it, and then somehow cover it up, or fail to mention it anywhere on THEIR official websites, or make public press announcements.
lol I didn't make up the ADL raid. it's linked to. The AIPAC spying case isn't linked to other than VT, but you can google it.
"Rosen intends to show that obtaining and leveraging classified U.S. government information in the service of Israel is common practice at AIPAC. He claims it was unfair for AIPAC to fire and malign him in the press after he was indicted on espionage charges in 2005. AIPAC’s defense team is committed to getting the case thrown out on technicalities before it goes to trial early next year."
I doubt RT would run something as controversial as Israel killing toddlers. The idea that there is truly free press is a fantasy. Though Press TV did run the opinions of Americans who thought sandy hook was israel.
When I say "I don't understand your point" it's an invitation to explain your garbled logic. Try it.
" Are you admitting you made this up?"
Where the fuck did I say that? don't put words into peoples mouths.
All you have there, is a former AIPAC employee, who got fired, and life long Israel lobbyist making accusations. While I certainly don't doubt it, its not the same as a Police Raid, and its certainly not substantial evidence, as the speaker is clearly biased against a former employer.
Its a law suit, and Rosenberg THREATENED, to reveal information, and he's hoping the AIPIC will cede something to him. He's not very likely to enter whatever evidence he does have into the court which makes it public record.
"I doubt RT would run something as controversial as Israel killing toddlers" If there was the slightest bit of possibility its true, they'd do it.
I know if Al-Jazeera would if they could get substantial proof. Niether publication is known to pull punches when it comes to either the US or Israel.
It still makes your claim about a FBI/local PD raid patently false.
" Though Press TV" is Iranian propaganda. How is press tv any diffrent than US mainstream news. In fact I've found their writing standards far below even mainstream American TV, not to speak even news papers. They litterally make shit up with almost zero correlation to outside facts, and re-print stories from American conspiracy theorists, and UFO fanatics.
reread the posts. ADL raid is acknowledged by MSM. what is disputed is whether it was a spying operation or a "lone researcher"
AIPAC has spying stories too:
In 2004 the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) uncovered information about an Israel spy working in the Department of Defence. The FBI identified the mole as Lawrence Franklin, a policy analyst working for Under Secretary of Defence for Policy Douglas Feith.
Franklin was accused of passing sensitive information to AIPAC staff and to Naor Gilon, head of the political department at the Israeli embassy.
The leaking of the investigation of AIPAC to the media on August 28th, 2004 gave advance warning to other spies working with Franklin. The damage to the FBI’s investigation was completed when United States Attorney General John Ashcroft ordered the FBI to stop all arrests in the case. Like the Stephen Bryen case and the hunt for “Mega”, this latest spy scandal seems destined to be buried by officials who have their own secret allegiances to protect, barring a massive public outcry.
"On 9-11, 5 Israelis are arrested for dancing and cheering while the World Trade Towers collapse. Supposedly employed by Urban Moving Systems, the Israelis are caught with multiple passports and a lot of cash. Two of them are later revealed to be Mossad. As witness reports track the activity of the Israelis, it emerges that they were seen at Liberty Park at the time of the first impact, suggesting a foreknowledge of what was to come. The Israelis are interrogated, and then eventually sent back to Israel. The owner of the moving company used as a cover by the Mossad agents abandons his business and flees to Israel. The United States Government then classifies all of the evidence related to the Israeli agents and their connections to 9-11. All of this is reported to the public via a four part story on Fox News by Carl Cameron. Pressure from Jewish groups, primarily AIPAC, forces Fox News to remove the story from their website."
Antisemitism has been a charge they have used against any critic of the system for years. How best to silence a critic of the bankers and industrialist war mongers than to label them an antisemite. It has protected them for 70 years to get away with all kinds of things. Just another type of false flag in a control network.
You do realize that Veterans Today is known for being anti-Semitic, and is in conflict with ADL, and are therefore, irrelevant of the truth of their articles, likely to fabricate information in order to villainize ADL. It is not honest reporting, it's a site full of conspiracy theories taken straight from Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
I didn't find the article thoroughly evidenced. In fact, there was no evidence listed whatsoever besides 'hurr durp, take my word for it you gullible crapsacks.' And the gullible crapsacks said 'ok, for you are wise and truthful in all things.'
I don't give a shit about ADL, but I'm not going to say they invented these websites until I see some actually, goddamn, evidence-ridden reporting from a trusted source that doesn't have a reputation for conspiracy theories.
Romney, like the rest of America, doesn't know what VT is, nor cares. It has zero impact. all he would have done was give VT publicity. Which would have given VT credibility like Romney had something to hide.
Yeah, I'll hold my breath on that. If they really wanted people to believe their rubbish, they should have given us the evidence. Burden of proof is always on the prosecution. ADL doesn't have to prove itself innocent, but VT needs to prove ADL guilty, and until VT does, they're full of crap.
Yes, because Mitt Romney really cared about some conspiracy nutjob website that matters not a fuck concerning his (failed) presidential campaign. They sue major news networks and authors over defamation, not glorified blogs.