Probably - the December numbers will more than likely STILL paint a rosy picture for Dear Leader, who has no troubles manipulating data, rigging elections and sweeping disgraces like Fast and Furious and Benghazi under the rug.
What sayest thou? How will Obamanation manage to pull his sleight-of-hand with the 47% and prove he's still making progress?
I really like that one of the top google results for Dear Leader calls the Canadian Prime Minister a Dear Leader in disguise, but no mention of Obama anywhere.
Let me guess, not that you guys can't make millions anymore, you're blaming Obama for your down fall. Pathetic. I do hope those business that are laying employees fail just so that they can realize it was their fault in the first place.
It should go without saying that blaming Obama for your own poor business decisions/Taking out your frustrations over him getting re-elected on your employees, is bad form.
We have turned a corner. The unemployed used to vote for a candidate that would get the economy going to create jobs. Now they vote for the candidate that will give the them the most benefits.
Because nobody could possibly oppose Romney over matters like his lackluster foreign policy, his conservative social policies, his flippant attitude about people who aren't wealthy white men, or even his ambiguous and highly-questionable economic plans, right? It's all got to be because Obama promises poor people shit.
Prior to the election the unemployment figure was bandied about daily, if not hourly. "No president has ever been re-elected with an unemployment rate above...blah, blah, blah." My point was that a high unemployment rate may have been good for Obama et al.
What sayest thou? How will Obamanation manage to pull his sleight-of-hand with the 47% and prove he's still making progress?