Shop More Submit  Join Login

Details

Closed to new replies
November 12, 2012
Link

Statistics

Replies: 78

Should Barry bust Bibi over 911?

:iconpsyopjunkie:
psyopjunkie Featured By Owner Nov 12, 2012
Obama knows that Israel did 911. Bibi tried destroying Barry's election chances. So will Obama get him back for it by exposing Israel's terror crimes?

[link]

I think he should but I can see why other people (especially Israelis and American Jews) don't want that to happen. What do you think? Is it fair?
Reply

You can no longer comment on this thread as it was closed due to no activity for a month.

Devious Comments

:iconpunker--rocker:
punker--rocker Featured By Owner Nov 17, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
:iconfacepalmplz:
Reply
:icondoctorv23:
DoctorV23 Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2012
No. This is conspiracy ranting and unsupported defamation. Whatever you think about Israeli politics, one also has to be fair.
Reply
:iconcartoon-bomb:
cartoon-bomb Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2012
Bibi can take me to court and I would win since he has to prove he didn't help orchestrate the 911 attacks. So much evidence to the contrary.
Reply
:icondoctorv23:
DoctorV23 Featured By Owner Nov 17, 2012
"...he has to prove he didn't help orchestrate the 911 attacks" -simple logic will tell you that it's impossible to prove a negative. For example, you cannot prove that you are not 'bad' (The Spanish inquisition or McCarthy 'investigations' did do that.) This is what is meant by the phrase "Justice is blind". Only verifiable evidence is presentable in a court of law. Can you present even one verifiable fact in support of that claim?
Reply
:icontortellinipen:
TortelliniPen Featured By Owner Nov 15, 2012
I'm a quarter Jewish. Am I responsible for 9/11?
Reply
:iconpsyopjunkie:
psyopjunkie Featured By Owner Nov 15, 2012
I don't know. If you were for example arrested in a truck with explosives, as 7 israelis were, then yes, you were responsible for some of the events.

exposing 911 doesn't mean throwing the rules of crime and punishment out the window. It's bringing them back in.

However, if there is a collective punishment of jews who knows where the line will be drawn. Will it be quatre jews, or half jews, etc.
Reply
:icontortellinipen:
TortelliniPen Featured By Owner Nov 15, 2012
If I were videotaping 9/11 and celebrating it in a truck full of explosives, I probably would do it where nobody could see me
I've heard the "Dancing Jews" claim many a time on 4chan's /pol/ board, and to me it seems mostly based on eyewitness testimony, which has been increasingly proven to be unreliable.

Also, you're mixing up your conspiracies there. The "Dancing Jews" and "Israelis with Explosives" were different cases, and the Israelis' van was found not to have explosives in a correction 8 minutes after the original report.

And that "thousands of Jews mysteriously didn't go to work that day" thing is also false. Hundreds of Jews as well as Israeli Nationals were killed in the attack; airplanes don't discriminate. How could so many people keep that big a secret? It would've gotten out somehow.

And if the news media had truly gotten a hold of conclusive proof that Jews did 9/11, the profit margin would be so great that no amount of Jewish influence or liberal indoctrination could keep them from posting it. It would be like a trillion Lewinskys.
Reply
:iconpsyopjunkie:
psyopjunkie Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2012
Hi, you are correct, the five dancing israelis were arrested in a truck with traces of explosives, not filled with explosives. This can be inferred from the reaction of the dog and the censored section of the explosives test results of the fbi report.

You are incorrect when you assert that the two israelis (not mentioned in the FBI report) were not arrested with a truck full of explosives. There is a tape which clearly shows there was a van with explosives, and another van which exploded.

[link]

That there was a correction points to Israel having control over personnel at higher levels but not over low rank police officers.

"How could so many people keep that big a secret? It would've gotten out somehow. "

Victor Bout for example has spilled the beans through his friend Dimitri in the book 911 the third truth.

[link]

Fox news covered the dancing israelis, bbc exposed al qaeda as a lie. It is not that the information isn't getting out, rather it "dies on the grapevine".

This changed with the internet. Now everyone knows Israel did 911. They might choose not to believe it, but they know.

That makes official announcement possible. Bibi must be sweating.

RE: trillion lewinskis, what about romney and his cuban mistress? why didn't taht get more coverage than britney's coochie?

He was isreali supported candidate, and money buys silence.
Reply
:icontortellinipen:
TortelliniPen Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2012
The whole Fox report that it was based on is based on hearsay and eyewitness accounts; a woman called the police because a friend said that she saw five Israelis setting up cameras. There isn't any proven evidence of the men setting up cameras beforehand. was everyone who took photos and videos of the collapsing towers MOSSAD agents?

And you seem to point to the correction of the explosive van report as a sign of Israeli interference, when maybe there wasn't any explosives in the van and they had to correct something.

Sorry, but hearsay evidence doesn't hold much water in court. You seem to be making up monsters under your bed.

Also, there are no Parliament records of certain British government officials explicitly saying that Al-Qaeda didn't exist. Nothing said that terrorists don't exist; only that a coherent organization didn't exist until 9/11 except for a few loose ideologies brought together by bin Laden.

Protip: Veterans Today is not a very credible source, nor is any site that uses a badly photoshopped picture of Master Chief and a Jew with evil red eyes.

Is it so hard to believe that a few bad men who hated America decided to hijack a few planes and crash them into a few buildings?
Reply
:iconpsyopjunkie:
psyopjunkie Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2012
"The whole Fox report that it was based on is based on hearsay and eyewitness accounts; a woman called the police because a friend said that she saw five Israelis setting up cameras."

This is false. Many witnesses interviewed and reinterviewed. One used binoculars.

Also remember they took photos of themselves celebrating and these were developed. This is damning evidence. The "witnesses are unreliable" meme is common on forums and false.

"when maybe there wasn't any explosives in the van and they had to correct something. "

Did you see the police recording? It contradicted this possibility.

"
Sorry, but hearsay evidence doesn't hold much water in court. You seem to be making up monsters under your bed. "

The dancing israelis sued and lost (because they sabotaged their own case). It is because the evidence would stand up in court.

"
Also, there are no Parliament records of certain British government officials explicitly saying that Al-Qaeda didn't exist. Nothing said that terrorists don't exist; only that a coherent organization didn't exist until 9/11 except for a few loose ideologies brought together by bin Laden. "

This is a misrepresentation of the video. I encourage readers to watch it themselves:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FfXubhxVV8

"Protip: Veterans Today is not a very credible source,"

What about the bbc?

"
Is it so hard to believe that a few bad men who hated America decided to hijack a few planes and crash them into a few buildings?"

Is it so hard to believe Israel attacked america, when they do it again and again, such as US Liberty incident etc.

I have made a compelling case. I will leave you with the last word.
Reply
Add a Comment: