Hail to the chimp

Forums > Community > Politics

~liberty-4-all Nov 6, 2012

Talk radio has been going on about the stupidest things determining who will be the next president. How the Redskins play, how some unimportant county votes every year, you know, that kind of mongoloidery.

But what about the way people seem to having leaders who look like monkeys? Shrub's resemblance to a chimpanzee was widely documented. Clinton looked like an orangutan. Even other countries have this phenomenon - Prince Charles looks like a macaca.

Romney could have been the fourth president in a row to look like a monkey, but he doesn't have simian features like his predecessors.

Could this be his undoing or will voters choose to return to the Reagan/Bush Sr. era when leaders didn't look and act like shit-flinging inferiors?

You can no longer comment on this thread as it was closed due to no activity for a month.

Devious Comments

~SynapticBoomstick Nov 6, 2012 Hobbyist General Artist

Well look at you.

*ProfessorMegaman Nov 6, 2012 Hobbyist Traditional Artist

Romney has no simian features because mormons don't believe in "evil-lution".

But then again, who better to lead a nation of neanderthals than a man who looks as though evolution passed him by? Unfortunately, W has already served his two terms and you've gotta dig pretty deep to find primeval lifeforms lower than him.