I've been involved in this debate perviously, and it's a tough call. If we legalize drugs,would crimerates go down? Would fewer people abuse them? Are we ready to take that risk? Or should the governments just step up it's efforts to punish those who sell and do drugs? Anyone ever been to Kuala Lumpur?
Everything else being equal, I tend to not like stuffing ourselves with a legislation after a legislation choking ourselves with what are legal and not. However, the issue that policymakers should go over are externalities, not drug use by itself. That is, if we decide to severely crack down on drug use and commerce, then we have to expand law enforcement and build more prisons. On the other hand, if we leave each to his/her own, then there are issues like drug den causing neighboring real estate value to dip, how to deal with drug addicts, and so on. In either case, we have to deal with cost associated with either options.
if drugs were legal, the prisons would have more room for "the real criminals" but there could be more crime rate. people do crazy things when on drugs, it's all over the news. so legalizing it could push the crime rate up, it might level out, but what about those who need the money to buy these things, so another crime rate might come about? there's a difference between users and abusers, but that line becomes blurred or people just don't know where the line is. over using isn't helpful, and I don't know, I find it troublesome enough that people are drinking/texting while driving, doing drugs could be worse. I think they should keep it as, until "they" can prove otherwise that "they" can handle and function