For a while, we've been reading his threads. We've been thinking we know him, but no, we didn't know him. Now we know we were wrong about what we knew. We knew nothing and now we know that.
When he first posted about the victims of gay rights, we were quick to assume that the prejudices he was defending where his own. In retrospect, we were wrong.
When he posted another thread, this time about eharmony discriminating against gays, we thought he had a problem with homosexuals being granted equal access to non-religious private services. We thought he supported social segregation of gays when all he was doing was asking why gays were out to "stir up trouble for eHarmony". So again, in retrospect, we were wrong.
When he posted a thread about how gays were intentionally victimizing heterosexuals by "playing the gay card", we noticed a pattern that wasn't there. We thought his threads were anti-gay propaganda exemplifying a small number of cases that didn't represent the homosexual community. We thought he was trying to use them to pass what we perceived to be his homophobic sentiments onto us. However again, in retrospect, we were wrong.
He showed us all how we were wrong about him when he posted a thread firmly supporting a gay person's right not to be murdered. He firmly stated that he believed Jesus would not "want people to to be going around killing homosexuals" despite the fact that that's what the bible literally calls for. Twice. He proved us all wrong.
That thread was a clear sign that you were showing an unbiased interest in gay rights, and is certainly not an insulting symbol of how you undervalue the intelligence of everyone here. So on behalf of all of us here, I am sorry ~CloudchaserShaconage. We are deeply sorry, and now understand that your threads were just like fox news, fair, balanced, and in no way pushing a conservative bias or agenda.
Now, I invite all of you to leave an apologetic reply with all the sincerity as I have hoped to show here.
BTW, looking back, it doesn't make sense that he could be a homophobe anyway. After all, such attitudes would be massively hypocritical coming from a man with a paraphilic penchant for fucking anthropormorphized animals. [link]
Do you really think he would listen if I bothered trying to talk to him? If I made a concise and clear argument calling him out on his bullshit would he respond? Doubt it.
Totaly unapropriate to call out a deviant on a politics forum, no matter what his stance is. And this actually furthers his arguments to begin with. Furthermore, I am getting a bit sick and tired of people on politics forum going ape shit mad at Fox news about their fair and unbiased approach. Yeah we know they have a leaning towards the conservatives of this nation. But when has anyone cricized CNN, MSNBC, ABC and the like for their staunch left leaning approach? And as a matter of fact a report came out that says out of the big 3 news agencies out there, Fox treated the 2008 campaign much more accurately and unbiased than the other three, not by much, but clearly it has.
I like how you single out someone for his beliefs, bravo.
--
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably." -- Captain Picard
their fair and unbiased approach. Yeah we know they have a leaning towards the conservatives
Hard to contradict oneself -that- quickly. Bravo.
And naturally you see them as less biased than the lefty stations, because you agree with them more. Just like liberals see CNN as less biased than fox. Just how it works.
Actually I don't agree with a lot of Fox News shit. As a matter of fact, I don't watch Fox news at all since they do nothing but jump on the stupidest and pointless stories about how this bitch got her kid kidnapped, this mother fucker killed his wife, and what is in YOUR food that is going to turn you into The Gay. Frankly I don't give a shit. I think all of those stations, Fox, CNN, MSNBC, all of them are bunch of scumbags that would bend any story to fit it's ratings. They are ALL in the same shit boat floating on a diarrea river of hypocritical bullshit. But out of the three, I must applaud Fox for at least trying harder.
So it makes you wonder where I get my news from? Many places, radio, internet, I like BBC a lot, I like to read and listen to more foreign news sources to get their take on things. I also like the Economist somewhat. and Southpark. Southpark sure does have a lot of things I agree with.
--
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably." -- Captain Picard
Have a great time everyone and please fav this article so as many people can see the featured works. I would recommend seeing each one and faving them too.
Daily Literature Deviations is a group that is dedicated to bringing literature to the forefront of the deviantArt community. We attempt to accomplish this by daily featuring Literature artists from around the community that deserve the recognition, but are not getting it. Each day we will feature 5 deviations from the Literature categories in a News Article.
In order to support the artists that we feature, we ask that you the news article as well as check out the individual pieces. We understand that each day you may not be able to check out each and every one of the pieces, everyone has their own things going on. We just ask that you make an attempt to help support the growing Literature community.
Daily Literature Deviations is a group that is dedicated to bringing literature to the forefront of the deviantArt community. We attempt to accomplish this by daily featuring Literature artists from around the community that deserve the recognition, but are not getting it.
Each day we will feature 5 deviations from the Literature categories in a News Article. In order to support the artists that we feature, we ask that you the news article as well as check out the individual pieces. We understand that each day you may not be able to check out each and every one of the pieces, everyone has their own things going on. We just ask that you make an attempt to help support the growing Literature community.
^Ikue has been a devious member of our community for almost 7 years and in this time he has proven to be nothing short of dedicated and devoted. Whilst volunteering his time over the last 22 months as a Gallery Moderator within the Community Relations Team, Chris has brought the Vector gallery and many vector artists directly into the spotlight. ^Ikue's commitment to the community is evident in everything he touches and you can always find him reaching out to others with an encouraging word. Chris is a natural leader with a vibrant and empathic personality, and is a role model for deviants everywhere. It's ev... Read More
For a while, we've been reading his threads. We've been thinking we know him, but no, we didn't know him. Now we know we were wrong about what we knew. We knew nothing and now we know that.
When he first posted about the victims of gay rights, we were quick to assume that the prejudices he was defending where his own. In retrospect, we were wrong.
When he posted another thread, this time about eharmony discriminating against gays, we thought he had a problem with homosexuals being granted equal access to non-religious private services. We thought he supported social segregation of gays when all he was doing was asking why gays were out to "stir up trouble for eHarmony". So again, in retrospect, we were wrong.
When he posted a thread about how gays were intentionally victimizing heterosexuals by "playing the gay card", we noticed a pattern that wasn't there. We thought his threads were anti-gay propaganda exemplifying a small number of cases that didn't represent the homosexual community. We thought he was trying to use them to pass what we perceived to be his homophobic sentiments onto us. However again, in retrospect, we were wrong.
He showed us all how we were wrong about him when he posted a thread firmly supporting a gay person's right not to be murdered. He firmly stated that he believed Jesus would not "want people to to be going around killing homosexuals" despite the fact that that's what the bible literally calls for. Twice. He proved us all wrong.
That thread was a clear sign that you were showing an unbiased interest in gay rights, and is certainly not an insulting symbol of how you undervalue the intelligence of everyone here. So on behalf of all of us here, I am sorry ~CloudchaserShaconage. We are deeply sorry, and now understand that your threads were just like fox news, fair, balanced, and in no way pushing a conservative bias or agenda.
Now, I invite all of you to leave an apologetic reply with all the sincerity as I have hoped to show here.
BTW, looking back, it doesn't make sense that he could be a homophobe anyway. After all, such attitudes would be massively hypocritical coming from a man with a paraphilic penchant for fucking anthropormorphized animals. [link]
--
Optional Redirect Petition
Use <i>[text]</i> for italics, and <b>[text]</b> for bold. Learn more here.