Now, before I start I just want to let you know that I have no interest at all in lolicon, but with the recent rectification to the law, closing a loophole which allowed for people to keep child pornography if it was not real, ie 3D rendering or drawn artwork. What I want to know is where lolicon would come in, as though the characters are not photorealistic, they still are intended to be children, and the sexual situations which they are depicted in can be rather extreme.
The other thing is where the border between lolicon and anime characters of a lawful age exists. As the style is intendedly vague, how can you definately prove what art is lawful and what isn't?