No Sir! That would be depends on your "own private interpretation" and private interpretation is contrary to the Word of God. In another words, its against the Law of God, the Bible, who makes their own agenda, only to suit their needs.

it depends on your definition of a Creationism my friend
some creationisms know that you can age the world uses isotope dating and do not claim it to be 4k years old
but they claim that in order to age the world you have to make assumptions that particles have always aged at the same rate even when they where not subject to earths atmosphere.
you also have to assume that said particles did not exist before earth.

then to age fossils you have to assume that these particles that are found in rocks near the fossil not the actual fossils itself got there while the animal was alive which is perfectly rational to assume.
However if you find something like carbon near a dinosaur bone you would assume the carbon should not be there as its way to young and the area has been contaminated yet they don't seem to want to accept  the same for any other isotope because it matches the age they want.

or to put it another way are problem is not with science disproving some old book and we don't discredit that it can be used to age the world

what we discredit is how many assumptions have to be made it order to do it.

also we dont discredit that evolution has taken place because if you open your eyes its clear to see but what we discredit is the logic behind it.

We believe that  animals are built to survive and adapt and that the world runs in a pattern where if one animal dies it effects the whole world.

we believe that the world is careful managed by forces humans can not fully understand.

Now  some people  try to disprove this buy pointing out how animals go extinct so nothing is protecting them but when one animal goes extint its usally because another is thriving and has taken its place.

they  also point out how no one protects us form disease but to me if nothing got  any diseases  the world would end up over crowded so its a control mechanism.

as for people thinking creationists are dumb that's more to do with the fact they like to believe they are smarter than them than to do with what creationists say or do.

for example some  people that don't believe in creationism  ask for falasable arguments which can be proven to be false.
  but the flaw to that is that that pretty much means you have to use scientific theory to disclaim it
so they will only accept science vs science .

meaning when others question them asking  how can you know the age of the world  is true as you cant go back and check they will call you an idiot and point to all the evidence in science.

also if you try to use religion they ignore it and tell you religion can not be proven.

then they expect people who believe in religion not to use there holy books and texts and to accept sceicne when they wont accept religion.

so at best you end up with a stalemate where both sides don't accept each others arguments and both end up looking like twats but the sceintist wins because more people are willing to support science than a relgious nut.

or at worst you end up with two extremists  people that don't have a clue about science or religion both making false claims  but once again its easier for a laymen to know the creationist is being a idiot rather than to check the very advance equations the scientist is using (that he has got wrong.)

so usually creationist look bad because they are already outnumbered and they are the ones that have to supply the evidence to try and support there claims while everyone else is trying to put them down.

meaning its easier for the majority.

so to change the worlds views someone would have to find some dam strong evidence and even then it probably wouldn't be accepted for years . 



fortunately however  there are some people out there  who are willing to take the time to explain there views and listen to other peoples views and hopefuly gain a better understanding and these people help to represent there cause better and help the layman understand it better and from there the laymen can make up there own mind with all the evidence.