On the news tonight, there was a report about an Irish woman who died during a miscarriage after her doctors refused to abort her pregnancy. For more information on it, read here
The question about abortion isn't one in black & white; there are many shades of grey in the middle. Although there are some good arguments against abortion, there are also many good arguments for it.
Most of the arguments against it seem to focus on the welfare of the foetus. They say that every child, born or not, is a gift and a blessing, and should be respected. While I respect that, technically, a foetus is alive, I believe the needs of the mother should also be taken into consideration.
Think about it; the woman will have to look after the kid for at least eighteen years, sometimes without any support from family and/or partners.
However, that's just the social aspect. What about when they go wrong? For example, miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies (when the egg is fertilised outside the womb). These could potentially kill the woman...and if the woman dies, the foetus is going to die as well.
So, now that I've said my main points, what are your opinions on the matter? Be prepared to back up your ideas, because I have a tendency to debate.
I think that if a women wants an abortion, she has every right to get an abortion. Of course she should be able to accept the shame that comes with it from some people in society.
Halappanavar had blood poisoning from a miscarriage. Even if she had received the abortion, all it would have done is increase her odds of succumbing to it. Using her death for politcal chest beating is doing nothing but taking advantage of her death and smoke screening the fact that she received inadequate health care.
As for abortion itself, it serves no practical purpose.
Actually, it wouldn't have, since blood poisoning almost always occurs before the miscarriage is even diagnosed. Her death had nothing to do with the refusal of an evacuation.
But by not removing the dying fetus they all but ensured she'd died. If they had removed it, she would have had a greater chance of survival. You said that if she'd had the abortion it would have increased her chance of dying, which is entirely untrue.
For more information on it, read here
The question about abortion isn't one in black & white; there are many shades of grey in the middle. Although there are some good arguments against abortion, there are also many good arguments for it.
Most of the arguments against it seem to focus on the welfare of the foetus. They say that every child, born or not, is a gift and a blessing, and should be respected. While I respect that, technically, a foetus is alive, I believe the needs of the mother should also be taken into consideration.
Think about it; the woman will have to look after the kid for at least eighteen years, sometimes without any support from family and/or partners.
However, that's just the social aspect. What about when they go wrong? For example, miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies (when the egg is fertilised outside the womb). These could potentially kill the woman...and if the woman dies, the foetus is going to die as well.
So, now that I've said my main points, what are your opinions on the matter? Be prepared to back up your ideas, because I have a tendency to debate.