Moral men and women will deny women equal rights.
Moral men and women will deny women equal rights.
Seeking and demanding sanctity is one of the main five best rules of morality. Those rules shown below closely resemble most religious rules. For humankind to give an idea sanctity they must give sacrifice to it. The sacrifice that we must all do is deny women equality and give men a lower position in rulership. Men must bend the knee to women and elevate them to our ultimate sovereign. Those women and men who do not demand this are not in the best moral state of mind and should try to move to it.
We are all natural animals and follow the hierarchical rules of those species which have Alpha males. The main survival strategy of such a species is that the Alpha males will fight to the death to insure that the Beta females live.
Females, as the incubators of life and the most important within that species, must have the highest protection to insure that they will survive to continue the life of that species. Men, being the most physically powerful and having a more natural tendency to rule, must take a leadership role to insure this continuity. The Alpha of any species fights to insure that the Beta always has the highest position. The Kings and all other men IOW, must rule as the power behind the throne but the Queen is the one who must always sit on that throne and rule over the King.
The research done by Mr. Haigt shows that the right wings of religions and politics show more concern with tribalism than do the left wings. It appears then that if we are to move to the most advantageous moral position then it is to the right wings to promote it. As an esoteric ecumenist and Gnostic Christian, I am the left of center and not in the best camp to sell the view that women should rule even as I recognize that they should. The right has been given a wakeup call thanks to president Obama being re-elected. FMPOV then, the right needs a new platform if they are to survive, as they should to balance the political spectrum.
Generally speaking only; women are the weaker of the sexes and are better places to know what the requirements of survival are and should thus rule. Women should then demand the full protection and sacrifice of the Alphas males as that is the natural order of hierarchical species and must be to insure survival. This sacrifice gives sanctity to our species and insures it’s longevity. The religious and political right seem better suited to lead towards this end.
In my opinion, men and women who do not agree with this premise are not taking the best moral position for families or for society at large. This issue is more in the hands of men than women and in that sense men would be more immoral than women if they do not deny women equality and place women above themselves.
Should the religious and political right take up this best moral position and demand that equality be denied to all women and demand that they be given their rightful and natural position above men?
Please see the research and logic behind this premise.
[link]
[link]
Regards
DL
Seeking and demanding sanctity is one of the main five best rules of morality. Those rules shown below closely resemble most religious rules. For humankind to give an idea sanctity they must give sacrifice to it. The sacrifice that we must all do is deny women equality and give men a lower position in rulership. Men must bend the knee to women and elevate them to our ultimate sovereign. Those women and men who do not demand this are not in the best moral state of mind and should try to move to it.
We are all natural animals and follow the hierarchical rules of those species which have Alpha males. The main survival strategy of such a species is that the Alpha males will fight to the death to insure that the Beta females live.
Females, as the incubators of life and the most important within that species, must have the highest protection to insure that they will survive to continue the life of that species. Men, being the most physically powerful and having a more natural tendency to rule, must take a leadership role to insure this continuity. The Alpha of any species fights to insure that the Beta always has the highest position. The Kings and all other men IOW, must rule as the power behind the throne but the Queen is the one who must always sit on that throne and rule over the King.
The research done by Mr. Haigt shows that the right wings of religions and politics show more concern with tribalism than do the left wings. It appears then that if we are to move to the most advantageous moral position then it is to the right wings to promote it. As an esoteric ecumenist and Gnostic Christian, I am the left of center and not in the best camp to sell the view that women should rule even as I recognize that they should. The right has been given a wakeup call thanks to president Obama being re-elected. FMPOV then, the right needs a new platform if they are to survive, as they should to balance the political spectrum.
Generally speaking only; women are the weaker of the sexes and are better places to know what the requirements of survival are and should thus rule. Women should then demand the full protection and sacrifice of the Alphas males as that is the natural order of hierarchical species and must be to insure survival. This sacrifice gives sanctity to our species and insures it’s longevity. The religious and political right seem better suited to lead towards this end.
In my opinion, men and women who do not agree with this premise are not taking the best moral position for families or for society at large. This issue is more in the hands of men than women and in that sense men would be more immoral than women if they do not deny women equality and place women above themselves.
Should the religious and political right take up this best moral position and demand that equality be denied to all women and demand that they be given their rightful and natural position above men?
Please see the research and logic behind this premise.
[link]
[link]
Regards
DL
Comments174
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Ummm no.
Your premise is wrong from the start. Our closest living relatives (Bonobos) have a very female-dominant society, so to just suggest that CLEARLY we are a male-dominant species is flawed without addressing that point.
It's hard to argue with you, not because there's no argument to be made against it, but just because your premise is so off base...
Your premise is wrong from the start. Our closest living relatives (Bonobos) have a very female-dominant society, so to just suggest that CLEARLY we are a male-dominant species is flawed without addressing that point.
It's hard to argue with you, not because there's no argument to be made against it, but just because your premise is so off base...
We are male dominated because our males are larger than the females.
Bonobos just happen to have the females larger than the males and that is why it is reversed with them.
You have chosen almost the only exception to the rule and on that flimsy evidence your deny reality and the other 90% who follow the rule I stated.
Regards
DL
Bonobos just happen to have the females larger than the males and that is why it is reversed with them.
You have chosen almost the only exception to the rule and on that flimsy evidence your deny reality and the other 90% who follow the rule I stated.
Regards
DL
Not always. I'm bigger than almost all males I know (bigger muscles, bigger frame, taller), and I'm not that much of an outlier among females. Humans don't have that much in the way of difference between males and females. And any difference that we do have is easily overcome.
There are many, many more exceptions than bonobos, bonobos just also happen to be our closest living relatives.
Plus your OP is just reinforcing all the negative stereotypes out there about people in my field...
(also, no offense ment but I suggest you stop signing your posts, that's what a signature is for and you can create one that will automatically attach. Actually posting it at the bottom of each post outside of a signature makes it sound pompus and jackassy rather than classy and polite)
There are many, many more exceptions than bonobos, bonobos just also happen to be our closest living relatives.
Plus your OP is just reinforcing all the negative stereotypes out there about people in my field...
(also, no offense ment but I suggest you stop signing your posts, that's what a signature is for and you can create one that will automatically attach. Actually posting it at the bottom of each post outside of a signature makes it sound pompus and jackassy rather than classy and polite)
Yep. "And any difference that we do have is easily overcome." .
Yes indeed. That is why the huge majority of domestic violence is men against women and women can easily overcomer this.
Now I see why you used the word jackassy.
Regards
DL
Yes indeed. That is why the huge majority of domestic violence is men against women and women can easily overcomer this.
Now I see why you used the word jackassy.
Regards
DL
Not really. There are many cases of domestic violence committed by women. That, as well as women raping men, tends to be underreported because men are afraid of seeming emasculated.
Possibly.
Your male female violence statement is also true but the ration is something like 95% male to 5% female and is not statistically significant.
This is partly why women are more important to most families. Far fewer in jail.
Regards
DL
Your male female violence statement is also true but the ration is something like 95% male to 5% female and is not statistically significant.
This is partly why women are more important to most families. Far fewer in jail.
Regards
DL
Again, it's significantly underreported. Although men still do a lot of the more damaging violence, women are pretty tough themselves. And as far as instigation is concerned, it is much more closer to a 50-50 ratio than 95-5.
Fewer women go to jail because of sexist people like you who insist that males are more violent and harmful. Therefore, abusive women are often treated like victims and don't get in trouble for it. If people like you would recognize facts rather than sexist stereotypes, maybe the world would have a better time combating domestic abuse against men.
SOURCE: [link]
Fewer women go to jail because of sexist people like you who insist that males are more violent and harmful. Therefore, abusive women are often treated like victims and don't get in trouble for it. If people like you would recognize facts rather than sexist stereotypes, maybe the world would have a better time combating domestic abuse against men.
SOURCE: [link]
View all replies
Wow what the actual fuck?
A post full of crazy.
A post full of crazy.
It certainly is. 
'We are all natural animals and follow the hierarchical rules of those species which have Alpha males. The main survival strategy of such a species is that the Alpha males will fight to the death to insure that the Beta females live.'
If you had even very basic knowledge of biology, you would know that in many species it's female specimen that are dominating.
'Females, as the incubators of life and the most important within that species, must have the highest protection to insure that they will survive to continue the life of that species'
Again, ignorance level over 9000. Example of nature? Here you go, lions. Which gender provides hunters there?
'women are the weaker of the sexes'
The stupidity of this statement actually burns. Lack of physical strength is often made up for by agility. Plus advantage in intelligence.
'In my opinion, men and women who do not agree with this premise are not taking the best moral position for families or for society at large'
Assumption that units are below families and society. In fact, families and societies are just sums of their members, of units.
If you had even very basic knowledge of biology, you would know that in many species it's female specimen that are dominating.
'Females, as the incubators of life and the most important within that species, must have the highest protection to insure that they will survive to continue the life of that species'
Again, ignorance level over 9000. Example of nature? Here you go, lions. Which gender provides hunters there?
'women are the weaker of the sexes'
The stupidity of this statement actually burns. Lack of physical strength is often made up for by agility. Plus advantage in intelligence.
'In my opinion, men and women who do not agree with this premise are not taking the best moral position for families or for society at large'
Assumption that units are below families and society. In fact, families and societies are just sums of their members, of units.
Exactly and the male protecting the one family as the best moral way means that all families should as well for a healthy community.
Regards
DL
Regards
DL
Actually, no. It's sexist and it could be relevant in middle ages, but in modern society, 'protecting family' becomes outdated as only the state has means to.
Really.
Then you do not believe that women and children should get the first seats in the life boats then?
Regards
DL
Then you do not believe that women and children should get the first seats in the life boats then?
Regards
DL
It doesn't have anything to do with 'protection' lol
Then join the Captain Coward fan club if you think he had nothing to do with protecting anyone.
Regards
DL
Regards
DL
you are mistaking every possible thing lol.
Too bad Islam established women's rights 1400 years ago, and today, modern society is still trying to figure it all out.
I guess you forget that male supremacy is in the O T which was written way before 1400.
He shall rule over you. God's own words while evicting A & E and in effect murdering them by neglect and locking away what would keep them alive. The tree of life.
Regards
DL
He shall rule over you. God's own words while evicting A & E and in effect murdering them by neglect and locking away what would keep them alive. The tree of life.
Regards
DL
Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's.
What is God's?
Regards
DL
Regards
DL
Ask Jesus.
Scapegoats do not talk. They just die and Christians try to profit from that death of an innocent victim.
Regards
DL
Regards
DL
Everybody dies. Scapegoats don't die from being scapegoats. You're indignation machine is overheating.
View all replies
Equality is an illusion created for the good of justice.