It certainly is touchy. There was a famous photographer (who's name I can't remember right now) who lost her grant from the National Endowment for the Arts because some of the photos she took were artistic nudes of her children. It was particularly sad becuase her photos are beautiful.
Well, in a perfect world, dA would be a good place for it. If we didn't have attention mongering teenagers and if people actually used the mature content filters and people understood the difference between art and porn, dA would be wonderful. Sadly, this is not the case.
Depends really if its like PORNO then yah its wrong. But depends how it is, I mean i would have to see it before I start to say any sorta kid naked is bad.
I mean like there is lots of old renaissance paintings with a nude baby or nude children in it in general and thats just culture and nothing wrong with it. Its not like it was made for people to get their jollies off on it.
I mean i would have to see it before I start to say...
I think we can differentiate between the two here.. but children posting naked photos of THEMSELVES. I'm talking in the context of dA. I've seen artistic photos of nude minors and I have few problems with them, although, because it's a political minefield i'd be more comfortable having the photos come from someone with a good reputation in the photographic field, that way they actually have something to risk if they were found to be seedy creeps.