I'm not against nudes, just the ones better suited for the porn sites. You know how they deviously deny threads as being better suited for your journal or some shit like that? So why can't they do that with porn nudes, like being better suited for the round file.
Awyiss. Didn't you know? cellphone close up with 3 megapixel cameras is totes art. Bonus if you can see them holding the phone and using a mirror to take the photo!!11
It's tricky though. DA doesn't want to 'limit' the 'artistic' members by disallowing blatantly trashy and un-artistic five second phone shots of cavernous vaginas. At least DA is sort of leveling it out by allowing BIG HARD COCKS. lulul DA
It's a grey area because of all of the many fetishes, you know? Some WAY more obvious than others..but.. I mean a kid who sees a vag is gonna know..but when they see like..vore? They dunno wtf that is..
Invader-PeacemakerFeatured By OwnerJan 25, 2013Hobbyist Digital Artist
DA needs to be more fussy about this crap..Seriously. When I search for anything (for example pokemon) my gallery is filled with people who's only objective in life is to draw all the pokemon with tits and get flooded with thousands of "oh so hot" comments.There's a fine line between artistic nude and nude beauty to fap material for guys that really need to get a girlfriend.=/
I'm more referring to actual nude pics. They get more comments than clothed women get. I maybe get 10 comments and they get like 30 or more. You can't help but notice what men like most, yet you hear that a scantily clothed woman is sexier than a naked one. Go figure.