I can easily agree with this logic, though my ideas are somewhat varying. Why do we let rapists, child molesters and murderers fester in prisons when they could be contributing by being involuntary test subjects for the betterment of a new tomorrow? We wouldn't even need to test on animals then. Despite what the majority thinks, I believe aborted fetuses are fair game as well. The benefits of their untainted cells could prove resourceful in curing all kinds of human ailments.
Sure. Prisoners have given up their right as citizens anyways. Though most rapists and child molesters get out at a certain point, as do some murderers, so I think testing on prisoners would only be done with life sentences or death row. It also invites abuse of the system, so there's that to contend with. And human rights violations. It would be universally panned by the UN.
SHAME ON YOU! We, as humans, have tried at EVERY TWIST AND TURN to FUCK with mother nature! HOW DARE YOU disparage all that EFFORT and ask us to return to times when the laws of the wild and natural selection ACTUALLY APPLIED?
The key to survival now is being delicious. If you are delicious, we will take you and cultivate you and your genes will survive and your offspring with be as numerous as the stars. That is the goal of natural selection, no? To be fruitful and multiply. Be delicious, pandas, be delicious, elephants, be delicious, Boninagrion ezoin, and you will survive.
Some people don't see the cynicism and sarcasm in this and think it's serious. They're dumbasses. The people who complain that it is to difficult to read or that it makes no sense need to go back to the single digit school grades.