Well I have been completely frustrated with the 5d mark ii. Was good for weddings but I still found myself manual focusing 90% of the time.
Now that I have really gotten into nature photography and am starting to make a name for myself im looking into getting rid of the mark ii and picking up a 1d mark iii.
Even though its only a 10 mp camera I rarely find myself cropping. I have a canon 7d already and was wondering if anyone has experience with the 1d mark iii?
I have been using a 7d for 2+ years. It's only flaw is that it is a dslr. j/k (the weather seals are not 100%) The only canon cameras which can outperform the 7 are the 1dx and 5dm3.
For me noise is an issue, it's not much better than the 1D II or the 7D. Also if you're looking at a 1D III make sure it's had the mirror issue fixed otherwise the focusing will be inaccurate. Personally I'd stick with the 7D, the extra reach is beneficial for nature and sports and I don't think the 1D III is a big enough upgrade (if you can't get something at 8fps you won't get it at 10fps but the weather sealing is better).
I had a 1D III for a few months and wasn't blown away by it at all - in fact I didn't really see a difference from my 1D II at the time.
Now that I have really gotten into nature photography and am starting to make a name for myself im looking into getting rid of the mark ii and picking up a 1d mark iii.
Even though its only a 10 mp camera I rarely find myself cropping. I have a canon 7d already and was wondering if anyone has experience with the 1d mark iii?
Opinions?