Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login

Details

Closed to new replies
January 17, 2013
Link

Statistics

Replies: 21

Budget Macro Lenses

:iconsilber-englein:
silber-englein Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Hello All,
I've been meaning to start doing some macro photography and I wanted to buy a starter lens for it. I've been searching for a while but I can't seem to find anything that's less than 400 without sacrificing a large amount on quality. I have a Canon EOS 400D. Does anyone have any suggestions for me? Is finding something with decent quality that costs less than 200 (around US$270) impossible? Thanks for the help!
Reply

You can no longer comment on this thread as it was closed due to no activity for a month.

Devious Comments

:iconposeidonsimons:
poseidonsimons Featured By Owner Jan 21, 2013
I use sigma lenses. They are cheap and produce decent results.
Reply
:iconsilber-englein:
silber-englein Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Thanks! :thanks:
Reply
:iconsecondclaw:
secondclaw Featured By Owner Jan 20, 2013
I agree - Macro extension tubes would allow you to use your existing lenses as macro. Be aware though that cheap tubes do not have contacts to allow camera to communicate with the lens. Some expensive ones, such as Kenko Auto Extention Tubes, do ([link]) and allow full auto-focus with the tubes attached. It may or may not be important in this case. I think that for $200 USD the tubes are too expensive, but a used copy may be good to get. I'm looking for one myself.
Reply
:iconsilber-englein:
silber-englein Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Thanks for the good advice!
Reply
:iconhedwards:
hedwards Featured By Owner Jan 20, 2013
I'm doing what FSGPhotography suggests. I found [link] on amazon and I'm waiting for them in the mail. I'll be throwing my 50mm F1.8 on the end of that. If I understand things correctly, I'll have about 9inches of working distance and have magnification up to 1.25x.

But, for $22 plus the cost of the lens, it's hard to go wrong. It's probably not as good as using a proper macro, but it's a lot cheaper.
Reply
:iconsilber-englein:
silber-englein Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Thanks for the tip!
Reply
:iconhedwards:
hedwards Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013
Starting in probably a week I'm likely to start using those extension tubes. Like I said, for the cost it's hard to pass that up, even if you don't have automatic control over anything. Ideally I would have a completely manual lens where I could adjust the aperture manually.
Reply
:iconchristophmaier:
ChristophMaier Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
I suggest you take a look at Sigma's 50mm macro lens: [link] (or for lower prices check here: [link] but I don't know the cheaper stores on that list so no guarantees)

I had it for quite some years and really enjoyed it. It's quality is really good it does offer a true 1:1 macro. Extension tubes might be an even cheaper solution but if you are serious about macro I would suggest going with a real macro lens from the start.
Reply
:iconsilber-englein:
silber-englein Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Thank you very much!
Reply
:iconphotography-forever:
Photography-Forever Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
You might want to try Macro extension tubes. Try googling them.
Reply
:iconsilber-englein:
silber-englein Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Thanks, already did :)
Reply
:icontimberclipse:
TimberClipse Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2013  Professional Filmographer
I have this lens: [link] (Nikon mount with canon Adapter, but you can get Canon mount) and I love it.
Reply
:iconsilber-englein:
silber-englein Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Awesome! Thanks for your reply! :D
Reply
:icondelahkel:
Delahkel Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2013  Professional Photographer
The Tamron 90mm 2.8 (the older version) or the Tokina 100mm 2.8...both under €400, both rival, and even beat the Canon L macro (unless you really need IS, or really rugged lens). You could find them both for much cheaper than that if you're willing to buy used.

Otherwise, get a 50mm 1.8 and use a reversing ring, or extension tubes.
Reply
:iconsilber-englein:
silber-englein Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Oh I do like what I found on the Tamron lens you suggested! Thanks!
Reply
:icondelahkel:
Delahkel Featured By Owner Jan 28, 2013  Professional Photographer
Glad I could help :)
Reply
:iconfsgphotography:
FSGPhotography Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Get a 50mm f/1.8 (~90), and a reversing ring (probably about 5-10 on amazon).

The reversing ring allows you to mount the lens backwards on the camera, so you can focus much closer than you normally could. The 50mm is amazing for the price, and should give you decent photos, as long as your technique is good.

I'd imagine this is the cheapest way to get into macro photography.

Alternatively, you could buy the 50mm and a set of extension tubes (there are various brands - Kenko's are good although not cheap), which will have the same effect as above.
Reply
:iconsilber-englein:
silber-englein Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Thanks! I've had a look at the reverse lens technique, and while it is pretty, I find it isn't as good as actually having a macro lens -- not that you can expect that anyway. I'll do some more on the extension tubes. Thanks!
Reply
:iconrcooper102:
rcooper102 Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2013
The Tokina 100mm F2.8 is less than €400 and has optical quality that exceeds the Canon equivalent in most tests. Tokina also used to make a 35mm DX macro which was considered one of the sharpest macro lenses ever made and it's price was pretty good as well. The focal length made it kinda weird for macro though.

I doubt you will find a good one for less than €200 though. Maybe a 50mm F1.8 with a reversal mount? ([link])
Reply
:iconsilber-englein:
silber-englein Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Thank you! I'm afraid of scratching my lens if I get a reversal mount. Wouldn't the inside of the lens be exposed to the elements then? Will look into the lens though!
Reply
:iconrcooper102:
rcooper102 Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2013
Well it is no different really than having your front element exposed normally. Just be careful.
Reply
Add a Comment: