| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
You can no longer comment on this thread as it was closed due to no activity for a month.
love 0
0
|
joy 1
1
|
wow 0
0
|
mad 0
0
|
sad 0
0
|
fear 0
0
|
neutral 0
0
|
for sure Canon is better, you can easyli see it in the secdond part of test - the photos with high ISO. Unfortunatelly i'm not able to do the test between for example Nikon d90 and Canon 60d, it would be much more informative, not only funny But a lot of people say that Nikon has more amazing colours, this is probably it, what you noticed on first part of test. But the colours of Canon are more true.
i wanted to do something like that, but i had canon first time in my hands and only a little time, because canon is not my, but maybe today evening i will do more photos, on bad light, with high ISO and of course on manual settings
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
I was sure that the difrence would be bigger.
The lenses are Nikkor AF-S DX 18-200 mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR and Canon 18-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IS.
The photos were made in the nearly the same time, all on the "auto". I plan to do more of suh a photos, particularly in the evening and with high ISO, but i think that in the middle of the day, when we don't want to crop the photo the camera isn't the most important thing.
And what do you think about it?